Guillaume Filion [gfk(_at_)logidac(_dot_)com] wrote:
Le 04-01-30, à 11:54, Julian Mehnle a écrit :
Guillaume Filion [gfk(_at_)logidac(_dot_)com] wrote:
Check the RFCs (or http://cr.yp.to/immhf.html which is a bit more
readable). "Received: SPF" *is* standard compliant.
Where does it say that? On [1] it says the minimum "Received:"
record would contain:
7. a semicolon; and
8. a timestamp
"SPF" doesn't match any of the other things (1. through 6.).
[1] http://cr.yp.to/immhf/envelope.html
1 to 6 are all optionnal, only 7 and 8 are mandatory. "Received: SPF"
is compliant with that. I admit that I should have said that "Received:
SPF" header is not forbidden by the RFC rather than saying it is RFC
compliant.
"SPF" matches neither "a semicolon" nor "a timestamp", nor a combination of
both. Neither does it match any of the items 1 to 6. So how can it be valid
AKA not forbidden?
Maybe I'm missing something, but I just don't get it.
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.5.txt
Wiki: http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)���v¼����ߴ��1I�-�Fqx(_dot_)com