spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: clamav plugin?

2004-01-30 17:09:41
Guillaume Filion [gfk(_at_)logidac(_dot_)com] wrote:
Le 04-01-30, à 11:54, Julian Mehnle a écrit :
Guillaume Filion [gfk(_at_)logidac(_dot_)com] wrote:
Check the RFCs (or http://cr.yp.to/immhf.html which is a bit more
readable). "Received: SPF" *is* standard compliant.

Where does it say that?  On [1] it says the minimum "Received:"
record would contain: 

 7. a semicolon; and
 8. a timestamp

"SPF" doesn't match any of the other things (1. through 6.).

[1] http://cr.yp.to/immhf/envelope.html

1 to 6 are all optionnal, only 7 and 8 are mandatory. "Received: SPF"
is compliant with that. I admit that I should have said that "Received:
SPF" header is not forbidden by the RFC rather than saying it is RFC
compliant. 

"SPF" matches neither "a semicolon" nor "a timestamp", nor a combination of 
both.  Neither does it match any of the items 1 to 6.  So how can it be valid 
AKA not forbidden?

Maybe I'm missing something, but I just don't get it.

-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.5.txt
Wiki: http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)���v¼����ߴ��1I�-�Fqx(_dot_)com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>