Guillaume Filion wrote:
I know that the spec is frozen, but how bad would it be to change the
header from something like:
Received-SPF: unknown (domain of sender domain.com does not designate
mailers)
to something like:
Received: SPF unknown (domain of sender domain.com does not designate
mailers); 25 Jan 2004 22:52:52 -0000
I'm no expert but it would seem to me that it would respect RFC822/2822.
I'm going to put both in my version of qpsmtpd so that clamav will work
correctly at least.
This is frankly utterly insane.
The meaning of Received: is established. It has NOTHING to do with the
use you are putting it to here and instead your proposal will break
parsing of genuine Received: headers.
Received-SPF: and Received: are two completely different headers. Anyone
who can't write a parser to tell the difference shouldn't be coding.
Wechsler
--
This message protected by the SPF protocol - adopt it now!
Details: http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.5.txt
Wiki: http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡