Le 04-01-29, à 18:08, Meng Weng Wong a écrit :
I was going to do something like
Received-SPF: pass (mybox.example.org: domain of
myname(_at_)example(_dot_)com designates 192.0.2.1 as
permitted sender);
receiver=mybox.example.org;
client_ip=192.0.2.1;
envelope-from(_at_) `ÖÌUÍ?®B5\Ãm:;
Would that be a good format?
There was some discussion of this a while back and the format looked
much like that.
For my particular case, clamAV is expecting a Receive: header on top of
the headers, so I would prefer something that respects the RFC2822
specification for a Receive header:
received = "Received:" name-val-list ";" date-time CRLF
One could expect that not only clamAV is expecting a Receive header on
top, so it might help for backward compatibility. Otherwise, I really
like the infos provided by your header.
Best,
GFK's
--
Guillaume Filion, ing. jr
Logidac Tech., Beaumont, Québec, Canada - http://logidac.com/
PGP Key and more: http://guillaume.filion.org/
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.5.txt
Wiki: http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)½§ÅvÂ¼ð¦¾Øß´ëù1Ií-»Fqx(_dot_)com