In <D0D1589F-52B3-11D8-8CD6-000A959B3A1E(_at_)logidac(_dot_)com> Guillaume
Filion <gfk(_at_)logidac(_dot_)com> writes:
For my particular case, clamAV is expecting a Receive: header on top
of the headers, so I would prefer something that respects the RFC2822
specification for a Receive header:
received = "Received:" name-val-list ";" date-time CRLF
So, what you are suggesting is that instead of something like this:
Received-SPF: pass (mybox.example.org: domain of
myname(_at_)example(_dot_)com designates 192.0.2.1 as
permitted sender);
receiver=mybox.example.org;
client_ip=192.0.2.1;
envelope-from(_at_)?TÊ?çĤAë?tC?÷;
We create a header like this?
Received: SPF pass (mybox.example.org: domain of
myname(_at_)example(_dot_)com designates 192.0.2.1 as
permitted sender)
receiver mybox.example.org client-ip 192.0.2.1
envelope-from myname(_at_)example(_dot_)com; Thu, 29 Jan 2004
19:27:05 -0600
-wayne
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.5.txt
Wiki: http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡