Guillaume Filion [gfk(_at_)logidac(_dot_)com] wrote:
Le 04-01-29, à 20:28, wayne a écrit :
So, what you are suggesting is that instead of something like this:
Received-SPF: pass (mybox.example.org: domain of
myname(_at_)example(_dot_)com designates 192.0.2.1 as
permitted sender);
receiver=mybox.example.org;
client_ip=192.0.2.1;
envelope-from(_at_)�`��U͘�B5\�m:;
We create a header like this?
Received: SPF pass (mybox.example.org: domain of
myname(_at_)example(_dot_)com designates 192.0.2.1 as
permitted sender)
receiver mybox.example.org client-ip 192.0.2.1
envelope-from myname(_at_)example(_dot_)com; Thu, 29 Jan 2004
19:27:05
-0600
Yes. I'm not sure if this is the best thing to do, but it seems like
what will break the least things.
You mean, it will work around things that are already broken, like when
expecting a "Received:" line at the top of the headers?
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.5.txt
Wiki: http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)���v¼����ߴ� �1I�-�Fqx(_dot_)com