On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 05:59:08PM -0500, Guillaume Filion wrote:
| Looks like Steve Bellovin was right:
| | The Received-SPF header line is badly specified. It doesn't
|
| I know that the spec is frozen, but how bad would it be to change the
| header from something like:
| Received-SPF: unknown (domain of sender domain.com does not designate
| mailers)
| to something like:
| Received: SPF unknown (domain of sender domain.com does not designate
| mailers); 25 Jan 2004 22:52:52 -0000
|
| I'm no expert but it would seem to me that it would respect
| RFC822/2822. I'm going to put both in my version of qpsmtpd so that
| clamav will work correctly at least.
I was going to do something like
Received-SPF: pass (mybox.example.org: domain of
myname(_at_)example(_dot_)com designates 192.0.2.1 as
permitted sender);
receiver=mybox.example.org;
client_ip=192.0.2.1;
envelope-from(_at_)?TÊ?çĤAë?tC?÷;
Would that be a good format?
There was some discussion of this a while back and the format looked
much like that.
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.5.txt
Wiki: http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡