On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 04:47:37PM -0600, wayne wrote:
|
| I think that checking things token by token is just plain confusing.
|
| Again, I think implementations of SPF MUST check for all syntax errors
| including unknown mechanisms. It MAY check for things like missing
| records in include:, recursion depth limits, etc.
|
Mechanisms are evaluated token by token, but modifiers are slurped up at
start time and may affect the entire record. I do not think people
should count on modifier ordering.
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.5.txt
Wiki: http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡