spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: clamav plugin?

2004-01-30 19:38:31
Le 04-01-30, à 19:09, Julian Mehnle a écrit :
Where does it say that?  On [1] it says the minimum "Received:"
record would contain:

 7. a semicolon; and
 8. a timestamp

"SPF" doesn't match any of the other things (1. through 6.).

[1] http://cr.yp.to/immhf/envelope.html

1 to 6 are all optionnal, only 7 and 8 are mandatory. "Received: SPF"
is compliant with that. I admit that I should have said that "Received:
SPF" header is not forbidden by the RFC rather than saying it is RFC
compliant.

"SPF" matches neither "a semicolon" nor "a timestamp", nor a combination of both. Neither does it match any of the items 1 to 6. So how can it be valid AKA not forbidden?

Maybe I'm missing something, but I just don't get it.

"Received: SPF" was an abbreviation (or code name). Here's a complete example of what I was proposing:

Received: SPF pass (mybox.example.org: domain of
                      myname(_at_)example(_dot_)com designates 192.0.2.1 as
                       permitted sender)
          receiver mybox.example.org client-ip 192.0.2.1
envelope-from myname(_at_)example(_dot_)com; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 19:27:05 -0600

GFK's
--
Guillaume Filion, ing. jr
Logidac Tech., Beaumont, Québec, Canada - http://logidac.com/
PGP Key and more: http://guillaume.filion.org/

-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.5.txt
Wiki: http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)½§Åv¼ð¦¾Øß´ëù1Ií-»Fqx(_dot_)com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>