Le 04-01-30, à 19:09, Julian Mehnle a écrit :
Where does it say that? On [1] it says the minimum "Received:"
record would contain:
7. a semicolon; and
8. a timestamp
"SPF" doesn't match any of the other things (1. through 6.).
[1] http://cr.yp.to/immhf/envelope.html
1 to 6 are all optionnal, only 7 and 8 are mandatory. "Received: SPF"
is compliant with that. I admit that I should have said that
"Received:
SPF" header is not forbidden by the RFC rather than saying it is RFC
compliant.
"SPF" matches neither "a semicolon" nor "a timestamp", nor a
combination of both. Neither does it match any of the items 1 to 6.
So how can it be valid AKA not forbidden?
Maybe I'm missing something, but I just don't get it.
"Received: SPF" was an abbreviation (or code name). Here's a complete
example of what I was proposing:
Received: SPF pass (mybox.example.org: domain of
myname(_at_)example(_dot_)com designates 192.0.2.1 as
permitted sender)
receiver mybox.example.org client-ip 192.0.2.1
envelope-from myname(_at_)example(_dot_)com; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 19:27:05
-0600
GFK's
--
Guillaume Filion, ing. jr
Logidac Tech., Beaumont, Québec, Canada - http://logidac.com/
PGP Key and more: http://guillaume.filion.org/
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.5.txt
Wiki: http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)½§Åv¼ð¦¾Øß´ë ù1Ií-»Fqx(_dot_)com