To make myself clear, we're talking about changing the subject of
authentication from MAIL FROM envelope sender to header Sender.
This brings a number of benefits, including this one: postfix-users got
rather riled about changing the return-path, and this lets us keep them
happy.
This is not as major a change as it might seem. In almost every case
I've seen so far, Sender: matches the return-path, and when Sender: is
not present, From: matches the return-path. Is this true for you guys?
Justin, this may help with the SpamAssassin effort too. Let me know
what youse guys think.
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 09:48:49PM -0500, Meng Weng Wong wrote:
|
| When using the envelope, we consider only the MAIL FROM return-path.
|
| When using the headers, we would use one of Resent-Sender, Resent-From,
| Sender, and From, in that order.
|
| A forwarder would add Resent-Sender.
|
| The envelope sender address would remain unchanged from end to end.
|
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡