On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
Yes, TXT records need an extension mechanism. Assuming that
any other
project that decides to publish information via TXT records comes to
the same conclusions that SPF does, they'll want to put their TXT
record directly in the domain. SPF has started the convention of
starting such records with "v=".
And we end up with responses over 500 bytes, game over.
Since when was DNS limited to only 500 byte responses?
If your DNS server, your resolver or your network has issues handling TCP
DNS, then it's broken.
--
"If the truth is out there, why can't I find it on Google?" -- Me.
GnuPG key available at http://www.keyserver.net/ or directly from me
http://www.gladding.com/tim(_at_)gladding(_dot_)com(_dot_)asc -- RHCE
#808002926806638
KeyID/Print: 4A585F84 / 405C F076 565E C6B5 A27A F60D DCF3 1F38 4A58 5F84
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡