spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: The Case For XML in "Caller-ID for Email"

2004-01-24 20:49:04
I think that the idea is (if you control your own DNSBL) is rather than using exists:%{ir}.my.dnsbl
you use
         include:%{ir}.spf-my.dnsbl

where the returned record is either 'v=spf1 +all' or 'v=spf1 -all'

The first returned record will trigger a match on the include, and the second will not. Both will get cached by the DNS infrastructure.

Ingenious idea really!

Philip

Phil Howard wrote:

On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 01:24:11PM -0600, wayne wrote:

| Fortunately, there is a solution.  Use include: instead of exists:.
| Instead of using NXDOMAIN and 127.0.0.2, use "-all" and "".

Can you be more specific?  I don't see enough here to be a solution.


-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription, please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡