On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 10:49:04PM -0500, Philip Gladstone wrote:
| I think that the idea is (if you control your own DNSBL) is rather than
| using exists:%{ir}.my.dnsbl
| you use
| include:%{ir}.spf-my.dnsbl
|
| where the returned record is either 'v=spf1 +all' or 'v=spf1 -all'
|
| The first returned record will trigger a match on the include, and the
| second will not. Both will get cached by the DNS infrastructure.
yeah, but then the problem is spammers will start spamming from
4.3.2.1.spf-my.dnsbl, which is why maybe we should put in a requirement
that mail never be sent from a host with an underscore in its name
... ick.
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡