On Friday 23 January 2004 11:57 am, Julian Mehnle wrote:
All these points made by Mystery Stakeholder sound like copy'n'pasted from
http://www.w3.org/XML -- but using these arguments, I could justify
expressing *everything* in XML, even ASCII (as Dan Boresjo said), or XML
(<opentag>xml</opentag> <opentag>foo</opentag> <attribute>bar
<value>zippo</value> </attribute> <closetag>foo</closetag>
<closetag>xml</closetag>).
They already have - it is the reasoning behind XML Schema versus simply
enriching DTD's.
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)�#�Mo\�H���U;��֤͵���