Marc Alaia [marc(_at_)alaia(_dot_)net] wrote:
I was heading out and fired off my email pretty quick, so I wanted to
leave it a little open-ended. Upon review of the SPF Macro Syntax,
there do not appear to be any other parameters that I would include....
What exactly did you have in mind when you were critical of Phil's
message?
None of what's currently supported by SPFv1's macro syntax.
wayne [wayne(_at_)midwestcs(_dot_)com] wrote:
I think privacy concerns should be thought out carefully, but I don't
see any problem with SPF as it sits right now.
Me neither.
Phil Howard [phil-spf-discuss(_at_)ipal(_dot_)net] wrote:
My original proposal of a DNS based Designated Sender mechanism was let
the DNS server itself perform all policy interpretation. A DNS query
would (eventually) include all the necessary data about the arriving
email, including where it comes from, to allow that decision to be made.
IMO Phil's statement implied that one might pass some private information for
the DNS server to make a decision based on it, like recipient address (e.g. for
distinguishing to:<postmaster> mail from others), etc.
If he didn't mean that then I obviously misunderstood his statement.
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)���v¼����ߴ� �1I�-�Fqx(_dot_)com