Julian,
I was heading out and fired off my email pretty quick, so I wanted to leave
it a little open-ended. Upon review of the SPF Macro Syntax, there do not
appear to be any other parameters that I would include.... What exactly did
you have in mind when you were critical of Phil's message?
Marc
-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Mehnle [mailto:lists(_at_)mehnle(_dot_)net]
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 10:17 PM
To: spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com
Subject: RE: [spf-discuss] The Case For XML in "Caller-ID for Email"
Marc Alaia [marc(_at_)alaia(_dot_)net] wrote:
How exactly is it a privacy concern for a receiving SMTP server (that is
receiving an email from joe(_at_)domain(_dot_)com from IP 11.22.33.44) to do
a dns
query of:
44.33.22.11.joe._spf.domain.com and the DNS server would return a value
that signifies either 'permitted' or 'denied'?
*That* would indeed hardly be a privacy concern.
I believe that is pretty much what Phil was suggesting, but with
possibly more information fields in the query....
*What* more information fields?
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)�#�Mo\�H���U;��֤͵���
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)�#�Mo\�H���U;��֤͵���