Meng Weng Wong wrote:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 10:46:38AM -0500, Philip Gladstone wrote:
| Do you think that we ought to goi ahead and do the magic DNS server for
| those sendmail users who just want a single rule? My concern is that we
| really want the SPF code incorporated inside sendmail, but that isn't
| going to happen quickly. The magic DNS server stuff could be built and
| tested in a few days -- though deploying an operational setup might take
| longer (need to find well connected machines and produce detailed
| operational plans).
That would work, but I'm worried that we'll see a scaling problem and
the magic DNS servers will be overwhelmed with traffic. Is there
something I'm not seeing?
You are exactly correct -- it would only be of use during a migration
period. The problem would then become of weaning people off the magic
DNS server, and onto native code.
Philip
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡