spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: RE: improving Received-SPF

2004-01-09 07:24:41
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 02:56:59PM +0100, Julian Mehnle wrote:
Jim Ramsay [i(_dot_)am(_at_)jimramsay(_dot_)com] wrote:
Here is another updated definition.  I was thinking about IPV6
addresses, and decided maybe the ":" delimiter between informational
fields in the comment were not appropriate as IPV6 is commonly notated
using ':'.  How do people feel about pipe characters '|'?

'|' is ugly, don't do this.  What about ',' or ';'?

It's probably not wise to change ":" into ";".  This will cause
confusion (similar to " ` " vs. " ' ").

just my 2c.

cheers,
Alex
-- 
begin  sig
http://www.googlism.com/index.htm?ism=alex+van+den+bogaerdt&type=1
This message was produced without any <iframe tags

-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡