On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 11:56:36PM -0500, Philip Gladstone wrote:
| I relate to the part that wants to see more information in the comment
| part of the Received-SPF header. In particular, maybe having the
| mechanism that matched explicitly as part of the comment field would be
| useful. You could then work out whether the message passed due to the
| 'all' or some other mechanism.
I'd like to make the Received-SPF header more structured. Can you guys
suggest a sane format?
I don't think distinguishing between +all and other forms of "pass" will
be useful. Square peg, round hole. Spammers can think of a dozen ways
to fake a +all. Consider "ptr:com ptr:org", or a bunch of ip4:1/2 type
things, etc. Better to leave that stone unturned.
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡