Thank you for the reply, and thanks also for your tireless efforts!
gregc
--Meng Weng Wong <mengwong(_at_)dumbo(_dot_)pobox(_dot_)com> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 02:41:17PM -0800, Greg Connor wrote:
| My quick read on the important points to address...
Thank you all for the suggestions on the article. I have taken them
into account and will follow the guidelines you presented. I take care
to present SPF as an anti-forgery technology first and an aid to
anti-spammers second.
| First, SPF will not "solve" spam. Claims that it will are not helpful.
| Acknowledge that SPF is one way to add accountability to SMTP
| transactions for those who decide to use it, but SPF by itself will not
| stem the tide of spam.
|
| SPF will help some domain owners guard against forgery. There will
| still be forgery, but those domain owners who choose to use SPF get a
| modicum of protection. Spammers who want to get their message out to
| more readers may start to avoid spoofing with SPF-protected domains and
| move on to the millions of unprotected domains. Thus SPF is a
| "necessary but not sufficient" first step toward addressing forgery and
| adding accountability.
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription, please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡
--
Greg Connor <gconnor(_at_)nekodojo(_dot_)org>
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡