spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Extensibility and Accreditation

2004-01-22 13:29:57
In <20040122202601(_dot_)GR28357(_at_)dumbo(_dot_)pobox(_dot_)com> Meng Weng 
Wong <mengwong(_at_)dumbo(_dot_)pobox(_dot_)com> writes:

On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 02:07:59PM -0600, wayne wrote:

| Agreed.  That is why you should put the accreditation service in your
| SPF record as an exists: mechanism today.

Dude, if you do that, anybody else who uses that accreditation service
can spam in your name.

First, accredidation services that exist today (bondedsender, habeas's
HIL, the-carrot-and-the-stick, etc.) already have this problem.

Secondly, with SPF, accredidation services can switch from DNSWLs to
RHSWLs.


-wayne

-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>