-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Meng Weng Wong writes:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 12:26:45PM -0800, Justin Mason wrote:
|
| BTW, on *negative* accreditation -- SBL have shown that this is
| possible and works well.
Just to be picky here ---
SBL is a reputation system, because the value judgement is being made on
behalf of the recipient.
An accreditation system makes independently verifiable assertions on
behalf of the sender. Accreditation providers, while funded by senders,
are kept honest by the need to keep their own reputations high.
Ah, correct, my mistake. SBL is a "negative reputation system".
sorry about that!
PS: say "hi" to Craig Hughes from me ;)
- --j.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS
iD8DBQFAEDYbQTcbUG5Y7woRAnk9AKCFJFcqEtKGsYGRnxJWGBFr5db83QCeIcOT
fTW9NVI5AMdXwe059DPPb7c=
=IlQ7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡