spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: SPF advocacy

2004-01-25 13:23:23
In <20040125211112(_dot_)A16112(_at_)slot(_dot_)hollandcasino(_dot_)net> Alex 
van den Bogaerdt <alex(_at_)ergens(_dot_)op(_dot_)het(_dot_)net> writes:

I think they've said something different: At least Wietse has said
he thinks SPF creates more problems than that it solves.  Time will
prove if he's right or not.

Well, from what I can tell from following the threads on the postfix
mailing list, I would agree with you.

I think one of the key points that Wietse is missing is that
forwarding is already breaking because people are doing pseudo-SPF in
their MTAs right now by hard coding lists of IP addresses and such.
SPF accelerates this breakage, and that is a valid concern, but if you
are serious about reliably forwarding email, you have to do SRS
anyway. :-<



-wayne

-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>