On Thursday 22 January 2004 3:49 pm, wayne wrote:
What is the problem with using "exists:%{ir}.query.bondedsender.org" or
"-exists:%{ir}.sbl.spamhaus.org"? Why does anything new need to be
added to SPF?
Or even easier, just including their SPF records...
As for the receiving MTA's reputation provider, see the proposal I made a few
months back for MTA's to begin SPF processing with a single configurable
'global' SPF record - which can list the standard callout to the sender
domain using the 'include' mechanism...
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡