spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Extensibility and Accreditation

2004-01-22 08:49:31
In 
<2A1D4C86842EE14CA9BC80474919782E0111334E(_at_)mou1wnexm02(_dot_)vcorp(_dot_)ad(_dot_)vrsn(_dot_)com>
 "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker(_at_)verisign(_dot_)com> writes:

What is needed is a way for the sernder to state which accreditation
services they are accredited by. Then the filtering software will eventually
converge on appropriate weights for that accreditation through the usual
feedback mechanism.


I've mentioned this before, but...

What is the problem with using "exists:%{ir}.query.bondedsender.org" or
"-exists:%{ir}.sbl.spamhaus.org"?  Why does anything new need to be
added to SPF?


-wayne

-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡