In <20040122095308(_dot_)GB28357(_at_)dumbo(_dot_)pobox(_dot_)com> Meng Weng
Wong <mengwong(_at_)dumbo(_dot_)pobox(_dot_)com> writes:
So here's a potential SPF record, already legal in the current spec:
v=spf1 a mx dk whatever -all accredit=_accredit.%{d}
The current SPF spec says that "dk" and "whatever" are invalid
mechanisms and the processing should abort. Or, has this changed
since 2.9.5?
-wayne
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡