spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Summary: Current state of SPF

2004-01-30 13:04:35
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004, Dustin D. Trammell wrote:

: > I wanted to avoid that.  I wanted to give domain owners a way to
: > minimize DNS traffic.  They know which rules are most likely to match
: > and which should be tried last.
:
: Aaah... That was the reasoning behind the ordering.  For some reason
: that one was escaping me...

Plus, there's an explicit deny result (-) that halts processing, which
requires ordering as well.  Without ordering, deny rules make no sense.

-- 
-- Todd Vierling <tv(_at_)duh(_dot_)org> <tv(_at_)pobox(_dot_)com>

-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.5.txt
Wiki: http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>