On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 04:46:08PM -0500, Mark Shewmaker wrote:
After the discussion on this, a light's gone on in my head: I just now
understand, (though even though I had been told this earlier), that
there would be a difference between:
v=spf1 +a/24 +mx +pgp -all # "pgp" as a nonstandard mechanism
and
v=spf1 +a/24 +mx +pgp= -all # "pgp" as a nonstandard modifier
Is this allowed?
"SPF-record = version *( 1*SP declaration ) *( 1*SP modifier )"
seems to indicate modifiers need to follow after declarations.
If it is legal, wouldn't
"SPF-record = version *( 1*SP ( declaration | modifier ) )"
be more appropriate?
And while I'm on the subject (nitpicking, perhaps):
"SPF-record = version *( 1*SP declaration ) *( 1*SP modifier )"
allows a record "v=spf1" but further in the draft is the following:
"Only records that start with "v=spf1"<SP> are relevant."
Does this mean "v=spf1" is legal but irrelevant?
cheers,
Alex
--
begin sig
http://www.googlism.com/index.htm?ism=alex+van+den+bogaerdt&type=1
This message was produced without any <iframe tags
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
Wiki:
http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/HomePage
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡