On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 04:46:08PM -0500, Mark Shewmaker wrote:
| This means that someone could publish even complex records such as:
|
| v=spf1 +pgp=example.com:v=1:must_have=1:along_with(+a/24 +mx):
| onfail_ignore_subsequent(+a/24 +mx) +a/24 +mx
| +pgp=example2.com:v=2:musthave=3 -all
|
| A strict spf1 client would of course interpret such a record in the same
| way it would interpret:
|
| v=spf1 +a/24 +mx -all
|
Everything you've said is true, except SPF clients aren't aware of ( )
matching or "" quoting conventions. This objection is not material to
your argument.
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
Wiki:
http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/HomePage
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡