On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 11:10:27AM -0800, Kelson Vibber wrote:
| <ep
|
xmlns='http://spf.info/1'><out><m><ip4>152.163.225.0/24</ip4></m><m><ip4>205.188.139.0/24</ip4></m><m><ip4>205.188.144.0/24</ip4></m><m><ip4>205.188.156.0/24</ip4></m><m><ip4>205.188.157.0/24</ip4></m><m><ip4>205.188.159.0/24</ip4></m><m><ip4>64.12.136.0/24</ip4></m><m><ip4>64.12.137.0/24</ip4></m><m><ip4>64.12.138.0/24</ip4></m><m><ptr>mx.aol.com</ptr></m><all>?</all></out></ep>
|
| It jumps from 210 chars to 387 chars - still under the limit for UDP, but
| more than a 50% increase in size.
But that shows that AOL, which is possibly the biggest ISP on the
planet, can fit under the 512 byte limit, so nobody else should have a
problem.
I'm playing devil's advocate here. I like the simpler format but I feel
that it's important to take the idea for a test drive before rejecting
it.
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡