Meng Weng Wong wrote:
Ultimately I think it comes down to different cultures. XML in DNS is
not acceptable to the culture that reads Slashdot, runs Linux, and
discusses standards openly on mailing lists. XML in DNS is a brilliant
idea in the culture that controls the market for MUAs on the desktop and
redefines the technology landscape on a regular basis.
The question is, who's got more clout?
Considering that SPF is not designed to interact with MUAs, I would say
this is a non-question. As far as "the culture that redefines the
technologoy landscape on a regular basis" goes, which is the more stable
system (in terms of longivity/continued use): the one that runs on
servers and was designed by "those who dicuss standards openly on
mailing lists" or the system that caters to users needs developing
desktop applications? I've switched MUAs three times in the past year
but we've been using the same, for example, DNS protocol for how long?
Andy Bakun
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡