On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 01:53:07PM -0500, George Schlossnagle wrote:
| IMHO 'human-readable' data formats are over-rated when their
| consumers are all automated processes.
That's actually an argument in favour of XML.
It's easier for machines to read, because we already have XML libraries
and a toolkit.
SPF is easier for humans to write but at the end of the day most people
are still using a wizard.
SPF XML
easy for lay people to write slightly harder for lay people to writep
easy for XML nerds to write very easy for XML nerds to write
new parsers have to be written parsers kind of already written
less extensible theoretically more extensible
thoughts?
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡