spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: considering XML

2004-01-22 08:29:51
lcarver(_at_)cs(_dot_)ucsd(_dot_)edu wrote:
Meng's suggestion for an xml include directive ("xml:_ep.%{d}") makes a
lot of sense in this kind of corporate universe.

In my universe, it doesn't.  See a previous message[1] of mine on this topic.

[1] Message-ID: <EHEOIEJMBFBKCKMPHFJKAEJAEPAA(_dot_)lists(_at_)mehnle(_dot_)net>

-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)���v¼����ߴ��1I�-�Fqx(_dot_)com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>