spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: considering XML

2004-01-21 12:50:24
On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 01:17:42PM -0600, wayne wrote:
| In <20040121185921(_dot_)GD6875(_at_)dumbo(_dot_)pobox(_dot_)com> Meng Weng 
Wong <mengwong(_at_)dumbo(_dot_)pobox(_dot_)com> writes:
| 
| > In theory, extensibility will be built in [if we use XML].
| 
| I guess I disagree with this.  We *could* have allowed unrecognized
| mechanisms to be ignored in SPF.  I think we made the right decision
| to not silently ignore typos.
| 
| I do not understand XML that well, but I can't see how new mechanisms
| can be created and understood by those systems that need to check SPF
| records.

Well, the idea is that if a sender domain wants to define a new
mechanism, it can change the xmlns attribute to point to its DTD and
people out there can subscribe to it.  Is that the idea?

-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>