Well, that is my understanding of the idea. Again, I can see
downloading something that will validate a new syntax. I can't see
how you can download something that would actually implement the
semantics of the new syntax. Without the latter, I don't see it as
being any more extendable.
I don't see it being any more extendable either, all its going to do is
be more work to parse, and just one more library required to handle it.
I think the underlying goal here should be to uncomplicate it where we
can, adding XML could very well be the straw that broke the camel's
back.
James
--
James Couzens,
Programmer
obscurity.org
libspf.org
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)½§Åv¼ð¦¾Øß´ë ù1Ií-»Fqx(_dot_)com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part