On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 05:40:36AM -0800, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
|
| > I suggest avoiding the term "joe-job" when possible, as I suspect
| > it may not be widely understood.
|
| Call it impersonation spam.
|
| People who have only a vague idea of what email is can understand the term
| impersonation spam without much explanation. Journalists for example. Call
| it a joe job and you sound like you are into some sort of exclusive clique.
|
New version avoids the term "joe-jobs" and talks in terms of fraudulent use.
http://spf.pobox.com/for-mit-spam-conference.gif
thanks.
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡
