spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: OT: Spam traps

2004-01-12 13:23:14
In 
<2A1D4C86842EE14CA9BC80474919782E011132D7(_at_)mou1wnexm02(_dot_)vcorp(_dot_)ad(_dot_)vrsn(_dot_)com>
 "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker(_at_)verisign(_dot_)com> writes:

Such mails should never go to spam trap addresses.  By 
definition, no legitimate mails whatsoever should ever go to 
spam trap addresses.  That's why spam traps are so effective.


OK say I want to cause moveon.org or elect-bush-2004.com to be blacklisted.

Funny you should mention getting moveon.org blacklisted...  It was
done several times via spamcop's DNSBL and such.  (It was actually the
first I had heard of the organization.)

Anyway, this is by no means a theoretical-only problem.


-wayne

-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡