On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 04:38:36PM +0100, Alain Knaff wrote:
begin Wednesday 14 January 2004 15:51, wayne quote:
Alex Van den Bogaerdt's signature contains:
: begin sig
: http://www.googlism.com/index.htm?ism=alex+van+den+bogaerdt&type=1
: This message was produced without any <iframe tags
The first line triggers a but in some MicroSoft email programs
(outlook? outlook express? I forget). The third line obviously
triggers other bugs.
I'm not sure I appreciate people who go out of their way to cause bugs
any more than I appreciate seeing these warning messages being sent to
the list.
Isn't it ironic that they complain about <iframe yet in their own
message they include that same insignificant string of characters?
Now, if I did send HTML messages and then actually used such a tag,
then it is something I should be thinking about.
What's next: Am I forbidden to start my email with "MZ" just because
some program thinks it is smarter than the sender (which specified
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
and not
Content-Type: application/binary
) so it should execute it as an executable?
cheers,
Alex
--
begin sig
http://www.googlism.com/index.htm?ism=alex+van+den+bogaerdt&type=1
This message was produced without any <iframe tags
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡