In <bu3km3$an9$1(_at_)sea(_dot_)gmane(_dot_)org> Jim Ramsay
<i(_dot_)am(_at_)jimramsay(_dot_)com> writes:
Meng Weng Wong wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 03:01:47PM -0800, Justin Mason wrote:
| | BTW does Mail::SPF::Query support a way to differentiate between
the
| second and third return types?
| Yes, version 1.97 will do:
my ($result, $smtp_comment, $header_comment, $spf_record) =
$query->result();
if ($result eq "unknown" and not $spf_record) { # record does not
exist }
if ($result eq "unknown" and $spf_record) { # record does exist,
resolution = unknown }
Have you put any thought toward my idea for the RFC to encode sender
helo, envelope sender, current IP, and matching mechanism into the
comment of Received-SPF in a well-defined way?
Isn't this already recorded in the received: headers?
Or, is the goal to have it available in a standardized way for easy
parsing? (There is a lot of variations in the received: headers...)
-wayne
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡