spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: SPF design refrozen

2004-01-23 16:30:41
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Meng Weng Wong writes:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 04:22:13PM -0600, Jeremy Doupe wrote:
| As an ISP representative, I would agree that SPF filtering should take
| place prior to DATA, however, I don't think the spec should mandate
| where filtering is to be done.  That should be left up to the
| implementer (since that is probably going to happen anyway).

OK, the people have spoken.  SPF v1 is frozen, and filtering will be
possible before DATA, unlike certain alternatives now under
consideration by the major ISPs.

Good choice.  Thanks, Meng.

(in SpamAssassin, we probably would have found filtering after DATA based
on headers handy -- but a *solid* *frozen* spec that works, and isn't
likely to mutate into something radically different, is more important.)

- --j.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS

iD8DBQFAEa6hQTcbUG5Y7woRAiSkAKDVgVFdhlHmCHrsb9BMA1e93oECVgCgmpsO
XJIdMNywT2S+eNprC5eYwHQ=
=AB6K
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>