johnc-lists(_at_)cleburne(_dot_)com wrote:
It really does not matter to me if it saves or not. If it is not
valid, I want to dump it as soon as possible. I don't want it on my
system, I don't want to have to process it.
From my perspective, it is my mailserver, and I can accept/reject/etc
as I choose. My customers can either accept the way I do things, or
they can find someone else to
purchase services with.
Well, that's my take on it.
Also, Dan Boresjo wrote:
Quite the opposite, I think it is irresponsible to accept mail for
delivery and then quietly delete it instead. I want reliability of
delivery to become a design goal once again, othewise email is doomed
as a
medium.
So I _always_ either (a) reject at SMTP time, or (b) send a bounce. I
would rather not do a bounce unless SFP has 'passed', to avoid
annoying
innocent victims of joe-jobs. Hence I perform all spam checks prior to
acceptance.
I agree with these philosophies 100% and couldn't have put it better
myself.
---
Dustin D. Trammell
Vulnerability Remediation Alchemist
Citadel Security Software, Inc.
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)½§Åv¼ð¦¾Øß´ë ù1Ií-»Fqx(_dot_)com