Take a look at POPFile, this Bayesian system is keeping 99% of the spam
out of my inbox and it's FAR is currently 0.01% ;-)
At a MASSIVE cost of cpu cycles. I've tried running pfile on a celeron
466 system (256 mb ram) which ground to a halt after a couple weeks of
use, granted a decent level of mail traffic. However, even on the
machine it runs on now, a 1.5Ghz Athlon it still graps 100% cpu during
mail grabs, slows them down extensively, in addition to taking in the
2-5 minute range of heavy disk and cpu activity at boot to bring the
daemon up. It is very very effective though given about 30 days of
training the client i'm currently using on work machine is around 99.7%
accurate now. For me personally, were it my workstation, the incurred
delays and CPU use are far from acceptable.
James
--
James Couzens,
Programmer
Obtain my public PGP key from:
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search(_at_)å?F?ÎóþÄvô5¿±?¢$Þ(æÖ·[Ç
My current project(s):
http://libspf.org - C SPF library
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)½§Åv¼ð¦¾Øß´ë ù1Ií-»Fqx(_dot_)com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part