On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 08:44:25AM -0800, James Couzens wrote:
| > Take a look at POPFile, this Bayesian system is keeping 99% of the spam
| > out of my inbox and it's FAR is currently 0.01% ;-)
|
| At a MASSIVE cost of cpu cycles. I've tried running pfile on a celeron
| 466 system (256 mb ram) which ground to a halt after a couple weeks of
| use, granted a decent level of mail traffic. However, even on the
I come from an ISP point of view. My goal is to reduce costs for my ISP.
Content filtering solutions are not acceptable for exactly this reason.
In fact, SPF is good because we don't even have to bear the bandwidth of DATA.
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡