On Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at 09:01:39AM -0700, Aredridel wrote:
| >
| > Is a 5% false alarm rate acceptable to the users? management? anybody?
| >
|
| Not cool with my users-- not many of them, anyway.
|
Speaking of users, I should point out that pobox.com users can now make
that decision on a per-user basis. Not our problem any more! :)
So you see these decisions don't actually have to be global. But
enabling per-user technology is nontrivial at this point in history.
I'm planning to opensource the architecture we use for per-user spam
filtering preferences. If you're interested in this, and especially if
you're an ISP running Postfix, subscribe to
colander-users(_at_)listbox(_dot_)com
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡