Hi !
* seph <seph(_at_)directionless(_dot_)org> [2004-01-07 10:53]:
wayne <wayne(_at_)midwestcs(_dot_)com> writes:
MTAs should try *real* hard to reject email during the SMTP session
instead of accepting the email and then generating a bounce. A rejection
can't always be done, but bounces sent to innocent third parties is a
problem.
If the spam was sent through a relay, a rejection will still cause a
bounce. Just not from you.
Yes. But if it is an open relay which is abused, it is misconfigured
anyway (IMHO, YMMV). So the double-bounces and the complaining people
are the relay admins problem, not mine. And they are not using my
resources.
And if the relay should work as relay, he can use SPF. Problem solved.
Or did I forget something?
mfg @ndy
--
personal web site: http://skater.priv.at/~andy/
Nachtskaten / Friday Night Skating Vienna: http://night.skater.priv.at/
Informationen zum oesterreichischen Usenet: http://www.usenet.at/
Verein fuer Internet-BEnutzer Oesterreichs (.AT) http://www.vibe.at/
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)½§Åv¼ð¦¾Øß´ë ù1Ií-»Fqx(_dot_)com
pgpoYpBNYZyzt.pgp
Description: PGP signature