On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 01:01:41AM +1100, Chris Drake wrote:
| I'm Australian, and we have no such precedent, but we have very
| different laws relating to emails than those that US people have,
| including (as I mentioned) criminal penalties for interfering,
| intercepting, reading-without-permission, and even forwarding without
| sender permission.
And does your service have the permission of the SENDER to FORWARD any
mail sent to an address in your domain (where they think it is going)
to some other address in some other domain (where the sender is not
aware of it going)? Does that put you at risk of criminal penalties?
| As a PKI-aware person, do you know if anyone is doing any anti-spam
| PKI work, like any paid-for "I am not a spammer" certificate system or
| other PKI-based anti-spam solutions? I think this would be an ideal
| alternative to SPF, since it gives SENDERS a way to ensure their
| emails reach their recipients - and the rights of senders are getting
| totally lost in todays anti-spam frenzy.
If you think there is a market for such certificates, why are you not getting
into that business?
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Phil Howard KA9WGN | http://linuxhomepage.com/ http://ham.org/ |
| (first name) at ipal.net | http://phil.ipal.org/ http://ka9wgn.ham.org/ |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡