spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: (foreign language encoded in ) Re: the inevitability of SRS

2004-01-13 21:58:25
In <20040114031212(_dot_)GN6875(_at_)dumbo(_dot_)pobox(_dot_)com> Meng Weng 
Wong <mengwong(_at_)dumbo(_dot_)pobox(_dot_)com> writes:


Personally I think the 64 char limit is ridiculously short.   Who
actually uses that limit?

I mentioned earlier that I remember reading about a mailing list that
used a very verbose VERP and it was being rejected.  Here is a link to
the comp.mail.misc thread that discussed it:

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&c2coff=1&threadm=41e0307b.0312161655.10bdb178%40posting.google.com&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26c2coff%3D1%26selm%3D41e0307b.0312161655.10bdb178%2540posting.google.com

So, while 64 characters is rediculously short, it *is* being used. :-<


-wayne

-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡