Roy Badami wrote:
> The biggest issue I have with SRS is that it currently breaks email
> address size limitations when the originators address is sufficiently
> large, see:
Rather than encoding the old address, you could just generate a
cookie, and retain the mapping (for a limited time). Maybe rather too
heavyweight for large-scale forwarders such as pobox, though.
I've considered that, but the point still remains that SRS in its
current form does not document this and Meng leans heavily towards SRS.
Either SRS has to change or RFC 2821 has too.
--
Anthony C Howe +33 6 11 89 73 78
http://www.snert.com/ ICQ: 7116561 AIM: Sir Wumpus
"...simplicity is a goal of good design,
it is never the starting point." - Dan Geer
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your subscription,
please go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡