On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Meng Weng Wong wrote:
The decision at hand is:
How important is it to reject forgeries before DATA vs after DATA at "."
time.
If it is important, that's an argument in favour of the envelope sender,
otherwise the argument allows use of headers.
Wearing my ISP hat, I say it is important to reject before DATA. If I can
reject based on the envelope, I don't have to deal with the inbound
bandwidth of the message being delivered.
--
William Astle
finger lost(_at_)l-w(_dot_)net for further information
Geek Code V3.12: GCS/M/S d- s+:+ !a C++ UL++++$ P++ L+++ !E W++ !N w--- !O
!M PS PE V-- Y+ PGP t+@ 5++ X !R tv+@ b+++@ !DI D? G e++ h+ y?
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡