On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 06:55:39PM -0600, wayne wrote:
| > +domainkeys:_params accredit=class3.verisign.com
|
| And how are you proposing that all implementations of SPF know how to
| use this new mechanism "domainkeys"? Why not just use a modifier that
| can be safely ignored?
He's not proposing that; he's proposing that in the future, if DK comes
out, sites that wish to support it can tell that a sender domain uses
it.
Sites that don't wish to support it will return an "unknown" and proceed
with spamfiltering.
|
| DomainKeys, the best that I can tell, is brain dead. I don't want to
| see it anywhere near SPF.
|
Whether it's good or bad isn't the point; it's whether we can support
arbitrary future authentication mechanisms.
We have a clear language: some things will cause parsers to abort
unknown, other things will be ignored.
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.5.txt
Wiki: http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡