In
<2A1D4C86842EE14CA9BC80474919782E011133CF(_at_)mou1wnexm02(_dot_)vcorp(_dot_)ad(_dot_)vrsn(_dot_)com>
"Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker(_at_)verisign(_dot_)com> writes:
Please define "extensibility" in the scope of SPF.
The ability to add directives. In particular the ability to add directives
of the type:
+domainkeys:_params accredit=class3.verisign.com
And how are you proposing that all implementations of SPF know how to
use this new mechanism "domainkeys"? Why not just use a modifier that
can be safely ignored?
The domainkeys authentication directive will be required if yahoo domainkeys
is going to play within the spf framework.
DomainKeys, the best that I can tell, is brain dead. I don't want to
see it anywhere near SPF.
-wayne
-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.5.txt
Wiki: http://spfwiki.infinitepenguins.net/pmwiki.php/SenderPermittedFrom/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡